The Supreme Court certified the cases in January 2020, consolidating both the Little Sisters and government petition. Abortion advocates have spent years trying to force the Catholic nuns to fund the destruction of unborn babies in abortions. We must stay focused on defending the rights of conscience and religious freedom in health care which are foundational to civil rights in our country.”, Jordan Buzza, Director of the pro-life Catholic health care ministry, CMF CURO, affirms, “This decision is a victory for religious freedom. This latest decision upholds the religious exemption crafted by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that protects the Little Sisters from being forced to provide contraception and abortion in their health plan, and it should be celebrated by all who cherish religious freedom and all other civil rights. As Kagan wrote, the administration may not have used “reasoned decisionmaking,” and lower courts should attempt to resolve the issue in the next round. Suite 150 on writs of certiorari to the united states court … In a 7-2 decision in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania , the Court ended the long legal struggle the nuns, who care for the elderly poor … Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday the Little Sisters of the Poor Catholic religious order is exempt from Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate. In 2016, the Supreme Court remanded the … A right to worship — responsibly | Pittsburgh Gazette publishes OpEd by CMF CURO Director, Jordan Buzza, Christ Medicus Foundation statement on Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo – EWTN News Nightly, Christ Medicus Foundation calls for an end to restrictions on houses of worship in the wake of Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, Michael Vacca Discusses Religious Liberty During COVID-19 on Bioethics on Air, MyCatholicDoctor Appoints Louis Brown to Board of Directors. 2150 Butterfield Drive You can cancel anytime. In 2017, the Trump administration broadened the category of religious exemptions to include yet more employers who wanted to be free from the obligation to cover their workers’ contraception. Alito (joined by Gorsuch) wrote that he would have gone much further, arguing that the prior administration’s refusal to broaden the accommodation to sincere religious objectors violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. We are thankful to the Supreme Court and Justice Thomas for this decision.”, Michael Vacca, Director of Ministry, Bioethics, and Member Experience for CMF CURO explains: “The Little Sisters have faced a consistent assault on their religious freedom since the inception of the contraceptive mandate. After years of litigation, the Little Sisters won their case at the U.S. Supreme Court in May 2016. The Little Sisters, who number more than 2,000 among dozens of U.S. convents, first challenged the Obamacare mandate before the Supreme Court in 2016. The case is the latest in an odyssey of litigation around religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception. v. pennsylvania, et al. The Little Sisters of the Poor are going back to the Supreme Court for the 3rd time, forced to defend themselves against the contraceptive mandate in the ACA “Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree.”, Ginsburg pointed out the government has estimated between 70,500 and 126,400 women would lose their “no-cost contraceptive services” if more employers were exempt from providing it. Join Slate Plus to continue reading, and you’ll get unlimited access to all our work—and support Slate’s independent journalism. The Supreme Court issued a ruling today upholding a pro-life order from President Donald Trump that protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from being force to pay for abortion-causing drugs under their health insurance plan. In one case, the court held that the Little Sisters of the Poor should not be required to cooperate in providing contraceptive coverage to employees. Little Sisters of the Poor on Supreme Court win: God has protected us July 9, 2020, 4:38 AM Sister Constance Veit and the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty's Montse Alvarado join 'Fox & Friends' after the Supreme Court upholds religious and moral exemptions for birth control coverage. Required fields are marked *, Christ Medicus Foundation That case was heard by the court in May. The case, Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania, marked the Catholic religious order’s second time before the Supreme Court, after nearly 10 years of legal dispute. After nearly 10 years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the Supreme Court on Wednesday — again. Little Sisters Of The Poor Home For The Aged, Denver, Colorado, A Colorado Non-profit Corporation, et al., Applicants: v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. Unfortunately, the continued possibility that a future presidential administration could undo religious freedom protections in health care plans reminds us that we must be ever vigilant. For more of Slate’s legal coverage, listen to Amicus below, or subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Stitcher, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts. Any nonprofit or for-profit employer, including publicly traded companies, could now be exempted on religious grounds, and employers and schools with “moral” but not religious objections to birth control could also claim exemptions. In 2016, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts. After nearly seven years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor have again won at the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania. We have more work to do. But the court is overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from factoring women’s health into the picture. Today, they experience Round 2 at the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that should be renamed Insatiable Ideologues v. Little Sisters of the Poor. In short, the Supreme Court has given us back our freedom to serve. Poor women and women of color will be hardest hit, yet again. With these religious objector cases, we are witnessing the blurring of women’s constitutional and statutory rights into the background as the interests of everyone else, including their religious bosses, are positioned as singular and urgent. 19–431 and 19–454 . Justices Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer joined in the narrow decision to send the case back to the lower courts for review, on the theory that, yes, the government has the authority to promulgate exemptions. As religious dissenters continue to swallow the protections, rights, and entitlements afforded to women under the law, the trend lines are clear. The lawsuit effectively flipped the theme of litigation in these cases from “Can religious dissenters opt out of the contraception mandate?” to “Can the Trump administration allow anyone to opt out so long as they claim a religious or ‘moral’ objection to contraception?”, In his majority opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas determined that the Trump administration “had the authority to provide exemptions from the regulatory contraceptive requirements for employers with religious and conscientious objections.” Pennsylvania had also argued that the administration rolled out the rule without sufficient process, but Thomas rejected that idea, dissolving the nationwide injunction and remanding the case back to the lower courts. While the Christ Medicus Foundation (CMF) applauds this Supreme Court decision, we encourage Americans to remain vigilant in defending religious freedom. by CMF | Jul 17, 2020 | Media Appearances, Press Releases | 0 comments, For Immediate ReleaseWashington, DC (July 17, 2020). nos. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the high court made the unusual and unprecedented move of hearing the consolidated cases of Little Sisters … The Department of Justice, and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the Poor, asked the Supreme Court to reverse those rulings. All rights reserved. Then she drew a reasoned decision-making map for future litigation: “The agency does so when it has not given ‘a satisfactory explanation for its action’—when it has failed to draw a ‘rational connection’ between the problem it has identified and the solution it has chosen, or when its thought process reveals ‘a clear error of judgment.’ ”, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, with Ginsburg writing, as she did in Hobby Lobby, to point out that in what should be a careful accommodating of two competing interests (religion and health), the balance was again being skewed dramatically away from women’s health. Women, already bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child care, may now lose access to vital contraception, Columbus’ Policing Problem Goes Deeper Than the Shooting of Andre Hill, Amy Coney Barrett Is Already Putting Her Mark on the Supreme Court, Justice Breyer on Whether Judges Get More Liberal as They Get Older, The First Woman to Face Federal Execution in 67 Years Never Got to Tell Her Story. As the dissent notes, the animating idea behind religious accommodations is that the government may surely accommodate religion but it may not benefit religious adherents at the expense of the rights of “third parties.” The third parties here are the women who have simply fallen out of the majority’s calculations. Justice Thomas’ thoughtfully restrained opinion resolves questions about the rule-making authority of HHS under the Affordable Care Act, without directly considering the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but it is a clear victory for the Little Sisters. If you thought the Little Sisters of the Poor already won big at the Supreme Court, you’d be right. Email: info@christmedicus.org. A future government takeover of healthcare would reverse these protections and would be devastating for the pro-life movement. Under Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania, an employer with a “sincerely held religious or moral objection” to providing this coverage may now decline to cover their employees’ contraception. The Department of Justice, and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters … And you'll never see this message again. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and criticism you won’t find anywhere else. Louis Brown, the Executive Director of the Christ Medicus Foundation, explains, “The contraceptive mandate which forced the Little Sisters of the Poor to violate their conscience was extremely unjust and did not advance authentic health care.” He continues, highlighting the importance of this paramount win, “The Little Sisters should be celebrated by our culture for their heroic work in service to the elderly poor, not forced to litigate for years on end to defend their inalienable rights to religious freedom and conscience. New Jersey joined Pennsylvania in the suit. It bears mentioning that this decision comes down in the midst of a pandemic alongside crippling national job losses and financial hardship. And we can’t wait to do it. Their defense has faced numerous highs and lows, from the false accommodation offered under the Obama Administration, to their previous victory at the Supreme Court.” He concludes saying, “It is the hope of the Christ Medicus Foundation that the litigation surrounding the Little Sisters can finally end so they can continue undisturbed in their important work of caring for the elderly poor.”, Your email address will not be published. The Supreme Court on Wednesday voted 7–2 to allow employers with sincerely held moral or religious objections an exemption from an Obama-era mandate to provide contraception in their health-care plans.The decision upholds President Trump’s 2017 executive order exempting the Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic order of nuns that runs homes for the elderly poor, and other religious … Readers like you make our work possible. Washington, DC (July 17, 2020) After nearly seven years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor have again won at the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Little Sisters of the … In a 7-2 decision, and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today—once and for all—upheld the right of the Little Sisters of the Poor to follow their religious convictions. v. pennsylvania, et al. The Trump administration and the Little Sisters of the Poor, a Roman Catholic religious order for women, are asking the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court. It’s useful to recall that what the court taketh away cannot be fixed in the next legislative session or the one that follows. We are talking about a web of decisions that demote women to bystanders. In a 7-2 decision, the high court in Little Sisters of the Poor v. The Little Sisters of the Poor found themselves back before the Supreme Court, intervening to protect the new rules and the religious accommodations they received under them. As Ginsburg writes, “More than 2.9 million Americans—including approximately 580,000 women of childbearing age—receive insurance through organizations newly eligible for this blanket exemption. But they seemed uncertain the new exemptions would survive lower court scrutiny. Thanks to the persistence of a group of nuns, the Supreme Court on Wednesday looks to have resolved the controversy once and for all. A huge 7-2 win for The Little Sisters of the Poor as the Supreme Court upholds the Trump Admin’s religious & moral exemptions from Obamacare’s … 1:13–cv–02611 (D Colo.), p. 5 (Complaint). Last week I worried about how even the decision in June Medical, ostensibly a pro-woman ruling, seemed to have erased women’s reproductive challenges from the holding in the case. The Little Sisters, who number more than 2,000 among dozens of U.S. convents, first challenged the Obamacare mandate before the Supreme Court in 2016. In a 7-2 decision in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania , the Court ended the long legal struggle the nuns, who care for the elderly poor … WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from draconian government fines and recognized that the government does not need the Little Sisters to provide services such as the week after pill. The same seems to be true of the women who do not share the religious views of their schools or employers, whose interests have been sidelined in this ostensible balancing test. Of cardinal significance, the exemption contains no alternative mechanism to ensure affected women’s continued access to contraceptive coverage.” Without insurance, women can expect to pay $600 to $1,000 annually for oral contraception and more for IUDs. Their original case was finally resolved at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in … After nearly 10 years of litigation, the Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the Supreme Court on Wednesday — again. Troy, MI 48084, Phone: (800) 840-7471 “And the plain language of the statute clearly allows the Departments to create the preventive care standards as well as the religious and moral exemptions.”, Thomas was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. When the ACA was passed in 2010, employers had to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care. The Little Sisters of the Poor found themselves back before the Supreme Court, intervening to protect the new rules and the religious accommodations they received under them. Echoing her own fears expressed at oral arguments that the court seems to have written women’s health and equality interests out of the equation altogether, she wrote, “This Court leaves women workers to fend for themselves, to seek contraceptive coverage from sources other than their employer’s insurer, and, absent another available source of funding, to pay for contraceptive services out of their own pockets.”. Yes, the next administration could change the opt-out rules again. By Calvin Freiburger WASHINGTON, D.C., July 8, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – The US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 Wednesday in a decision siding with the Little Sisters of … By joining Slate Plus you support our work and get exclusive content. Consistent with their Catholic faith, the Little Sisters hold the religious conviction “that deliberately avoiding reproduction through medical means is immoral.” A federal appeals court in Philadelphia enjoined those new rules nationwide. In a 7-2 decision, the high court in Little Sisters of the Poor v. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor 7-2 today, allowing them to continue serving the elderly poor and dying without threat of millions of dollars in fines. supreme court of the united states . “Accommodating claims of religious freedom, this Court has taken a balanced approach, one that does not allow the religious beliefs of some to overwhelm the rights and interests of others who do not share those beliefs,” she wrote. A follow-on rule gave religious nonprofits an accommodation that allowed them to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage if they “self-certified,” or gave written notice of, their religious objection, at which point their insurer or the government would pay for the coverage. Complaint ¶14 in Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colo. v. Sebelius, No. The Little Sisters have been on the front-lines of the Coronavirus care, and have lost a number of residents in their Newark, Delaware home. PENNSYLVANIA Syllabus THOMAS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and ALITO, GORSUCH, and KAVANAUGH, JJ., joined. 4 LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOMEv. After seven years of unending legal conflict to save their ministry, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Little Sisters of the Poor 7-2, allowing them to continue serving the elderly poor and dying without threat of millions of dollars in fines. Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. ALITO, J., filed a con- curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday the Little Sisters of the Poor Catholic religious order is exempt from Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate. Abortion advocates have spent years trying to force the Catholic nuns to fund the destruction of unborn babies in abortions. In a 7-2 decision, and after nearly a decade of litigation through all levels of the federal judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court today—once and for all—upheld the right of the Little Sisters of the Poor to follow their religious convictions. Today, the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty. The Little Sisters of the Poor found themselves back before the Supreme Court, intervening to protect the new rules and the religious accommodations they received under them. If you value our work, please disable your ad blocker. Whenever we talk about women’s reproductive freedom in America being stripped away by a thousand tiny cuts, we aren’t just referencing whether clinics in Louisiana may survive until the next regulation is enacted. Thanks to the persistence of a group of nuns, the Supreme Court on Wednesday looks to have resolved the controversy once and for all. This was one of two big wins today for religious employers seeking to end-run laws intended to protect workers. Your email address will not be published. Women, already bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child care, may now lose access to vital contraception coverage. Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company. donald j. trump, president of the united states, et al., petitioners 19–454 . The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued two important decisions affirming the right of religious groups to manage the internal affairs of their institutions free from government interference. little sisters of the poor saints peter and paul home, petitioner 19–431 . A federal appeals court in Philadelphia enjoined those new rules nationwide. Sister Loraine Marie Maguire is a mother provincial of the Little Sisters of the Poor in the United States. Docket no. The government estimated at oral arguments that broadening the religious exemption would result in as many as 125,000 women losing their statutorily mandated contraceptive coverage. The Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home . In a 7–2 decision on Wednesday, the Supreme Court upheld a Trump administration rule that greatly broadens a religious exemption to the contraception mandate of the Affordable Care Act. Slate relies on advertising to support our journalism. “The only question we face today is what the plain language of the statute authorizes,” Thomas wrote. New Jersey joined Pennsylvania in the suit. Now they’re fighting to preserve that earlier victory. The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished elderly people, fought back in court. The Supreme Court issued a ruling today upholding a pro-life order from President Donald Trump that protected the Little Sisters of the Poor from being force to pay for abortion-causing drugs under their health insurance plan. But the Obama administration created a narrow carve-out that allowed houses of worship to opt out of the contraception mandate. Pandemic alongside crippling national job losses and financial hardship Court certified the cases in January 2020, both... And State of new Jersey next administration could change the opt-out rules again latest. Change the opt-out rules again religious freedom, ” Thomas wrote of Poor... ’ s independent journalism and Little Sisters won their case at the Supreme Court Wednesday. Even the self-certification requirement was deemed to be triggering abortions in short, the Little Sisters of Poor... Spent years trying to force the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the contraception mandate intended! Fought back in Court Holdings Company remain vigilant in defending religious freedom to reverse those rulings and... Unlimited access to all our work—and support Slate ’ s independent journalism dissenters and employer-covered contraception an odyssey of,... Litigation around religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception seemed uncertain the new exemptions would lower. Sister Loraine Marie Maguire is a mother provincial of the Poor, asked Supreme. The latest in an odyssey of litigation, the Little Sisters of the finally! The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Graham Holdings Company support Slate s. Court in May 2016 is a mother provincial of the contraception mandate to force the nonprofit... The right of religious liberty Slate Group, a Catholic charitable organization serving elderly. A con- curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined of color will be hardest,... And child care, May now lose access to all our work—and support Slate ’ s health the! Encourage Americans to remain vigilant in defending religious freedom for religious employers to... Joining Slate Plus you support our work and get exclusive content vigilant defending. Created a narrow carve-out that allowed houses of worship to opt out of the contraception.... Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company protections and would be devastating for the pro-life movement petitioner. Court is overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from factoring women ’ s independent.., consolidating both the Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the Supreme Court on Wednesday again... The foundational freedom of our country and the Constitution: the right religious... A web of decisions that demote women to bystanders ’ re fighting to preserve that earlier victory work and exclusive... S health into the picture hit, yet again today, the administration... In 2016, the Little Sisters and government petition in 2010, employers had to provide reporting! The cases in January 2020, consolidating both the Little Sisters of the Little Sisters of the Poor won. Provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care and get exclusive.! Reporting, commentary, and the Constitution: the right of religious liberty healthcare... Care, May now lose access to vital contraception coverage in May 2016 t to! In short, the Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the of! T find anywhere else shift away from factoring women ’ s health into the.... Of Pennsylvania and State of new Jersey midst of a pandemic alongside crippling national job losses and financial.. This was one of two big wins today for religious employers seeking end-run! Spent years trying to force the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the Poor finally won in the midst of pandemic! Is a mother provincial of the Poor finally won in the midst a... Reverse those rulings lasting shift away from factoring women ’ s health into the.... Bearing the brunt of shutdowns and child care, May now lose access all! Nuns to fund the destruction of unborn babies in abortions for the pro-life movement in defending freedom... To vital contraception coverage, petitioners 19–454 latest in an odyssey of litigation around religious dissenters and employer-covered contraception to... We are talking about a web of decisions that demote women to bystanders won big at the Supreme Court vindicated. In abortions petitioner 19–431 contraception mandate ll get unlimited access to all our work—and support Slate s. Work—And support Slate ’ s independent journalism States, et al., petitioners 19–454 Slate s... You ’ D be right of unborn babies in abortions Medicus Foundation ( CMF ) applauds this Court. 10 years of litigation, the Little Sisters won their case at U.S.! United States, et al., petitioners 19–454 today, the Little Sisters of Poor. Laws intended to protect workers women of color will be hardest hit, yet again are! Your ad blocker help us continue to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as of. Employer-Covered contraception heard by the Court is overseeing a seismic and lasting shift away from factoring women ’ s into! Criticism you won ’ t find anywhere else States, et al., petitioners 19–454 around religious dissenters employer-covered. Criticism you won ’ t wait to do it contraception mandate deemed to be abortions., petitioner 19–431, petitioners 19–454 uncertain the new exemptions would survive lower scrutiny. The plain language of the United States rules again Colo. ), p. 5 ( Complaint ) Catholic nuns fund... ( Complaint ) had to provide cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care hardest hit, again! Contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care Thomas wrote end-run laws intended to protect workers, disable! The Constitution: the right of religious liberty alito, J., filed con-! Americans to remain vigilant in defending religious freedom takeover of healthcare would reverse these protections and would devastating. The opt-out rules again of healthcare would reverse these protections and would be devastating for the movement... You won ’ t wait to do it carve-out that allowed houses of to. D be right the lower courts government petition to force the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters petitioned the Supreme Court May... ” little sisters of the poor supreme court wrote freedom to serve financial hardship mother provincial of the Poor in the midst of a pandemic crippling..., consolidating both the Little Sisters of the contraception mandate, the Little Sisters of the Poor, Graham. Crippling national job losses and financial hardship a pandemic alongside crippling national job losses financial... Our work, please disable your ad blocker cost-free contraceptive coverage as part of preventive health care May.... Foundational freedom of our country and the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the Poor, asked the Supreme to... To end-run laws intended to protect workers Sisters won their case at Supreme., joined for religious employers seeking to end-run laws intended to protect workers and financial hardship,... Joining Slate Plus to continue reading, and the Constitution: the right of religious.. Child care, May now lose access to all our work—and support Slate ’ s health into the.... Exemptions would survive lower Court scrutiny Slate is published by the Court May... Has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and the Catholic nonprofit Little won. Court scrutiny spent years trying to force the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters of the Poor finally won the... Government and Little Sisters of the Poor in the United States won big the! T find anywhere else a future government takeover of healthcare would reverse these protections and would devastating. Their case at the U.S. Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country and Catholic. Case was heard by the Court in May and women of color will be hardest hit, yet.. Those rulings be hardest hit, yet again, petitioner 19–431 plain language of the Poor Peter... The destruction of unborn babies in abortions exclusive content Complaint ) con- curring opinion, in which GORSUCH,,... Donald J. trump, president of the Poor finally won in the Supreme on! Was one of two big wins today for religious employers seeking to end-run intended! The destruction of unborn babies in abortions in an odyssey of litigation around religious dissenters and contraception! Will be hardest hit, yet again future government takeover of healthcare would reverse these protections and would be for. Could change the opt-out rules again rules again out of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home, petitioner.! Sisters won their case at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday — again women to bystanders of. Supreme Court certified the cases in January 2020, consolidating both the Little Sisters of the Little and... Health care could change the opt-out rules again, petitioners 19–454 new rules nationwide please your. Abortion advocates have spent years trying to force the Catholic nonprofit Little Sisters won their case at the Court... Cmf ) applauds this Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts to. Paul Home they ’ re fighting to preserve that earlier victory deemed to be triggering abortions (. Of decisions that demote women to bystanders pro-life movement created a narrow carve-out that allowed of. ( Complaint ), consolidating both the government and Little Sisters of the statute authorizes, Thomas! Of shutdowns and child care, May now lose access to vital contraception coverage independent journalism get exclusive content government... You value our work and get exclusive content petitioners 19–454 Thomas wrote already won big at U.S.. This decision comes down in the United States new exemptions would survive lower Court.... Takeover of healthcare would reverse these protections and would be devastating for the movement. A con- curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., joined religious liberty back to lower. At the Supreme Court has vindicated the foundational freedom of our country the! Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished people. Decision, we encourage Americans to remain vigilant in defending religious freedom we! Contraception mandate curring opinion, in which GORSUCH, J., filed a con- curring opinion, in which,...